Attorneys for a major asbestos maker have withdrawn their claim that a New York Supreme Court clerk helped backdate amended asbestos complaints at the behest of plaintiffs' firm Weitz & Luxenberg. The development is the latest turn in a 3-year-old case in which G-I Holdings asserts that Weitz & Luxenberg and other firms were part of a concerted effort to punish G-I for its attempts to persuade Congress to impose a cap on asbestos-related claims and attorney fees.
December 05, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Where the region's top lawyers, law firms and in-house teams will gather to celebrate their most stellar achievements of the year.
Looking for an Associate Attorney with 2 to 5 years experience to handle Labor and Employment Law, Pension Appeals and Workers Compensation....
We are seeking a lawyer with a minimum of five years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowned C...
We are seeking a lawyer with extensive transactional intellectual property experience to join our corporate practice. Candidates should hav...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. WELCOME HONORABLE GARRY S. ROTHSTADT, J.A.D. (RET.)
GREENBAUM ROWE SMITH & DAVIS LLP would like to announce that...
