X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A cookie sale at Southern Methodist University came to a disturbing end on Sept. 25, 2003. Organized by the Young Conservatives of Texas, the sale was intended to be an anti-affirmative action sale, modeled after a similar sale at the University of California, Berkeley in February by the Berkeley College Republicans. The sale at Berkeley had different prices for cookies depending on race and sex of the purchaser and used the same classifications that the university used in its hiring practices. The prices of cookies at Berkeley ranged from $1.50 for white males to $.25 for black women. The sponsors of the Berkeley sale said that the goal was to demonstrate the absurdity of the affirmative action system. The sale produced much protest and heated arguments. One student showed up with a sign reading “Free Cookies for Legacy Students” and another had a sign saying “Free Cookies for Athletes.” The interesting irony of the Berkeley sale was that most of the protest was by the very students who would have benefited from the cheaper cookies, namely women and minorities, and the sale was being conducted by a group of students who thought racial preferences were inherently discriminatory. The sale finally petered out after a protest by Black Republicans, with the sponsors of the sale saying they had made their point and hoped that they got people thinking about the impacts of affirmative action. The cookie sale was repeated on numerous other campuses with similar arguments and debates, with proponents of the sale arguing that it cannot be considered offensive to sell cookies based upon the same racial classifications that are used in hiring or admission of students to the universities. When the sale was held at Southern Methodist University, however, the university ordered the sale discontinued when a student complained it was offensive. It seems that the politically correct police are alive and well at Southern Methodist University. Unfortunately, students at SMU may now return to extracurricular activities common of today’s college students, such as binge drinking and reality TV, without being disturbed by public policy debates. We should encourage colleges and universities to allow free debate and discussion of important public policy issues. It is encouraging to see that this debate occurred at so many universities and that SMU seemed to be the exception rather than the norm.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.