X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Brokerage J.P. Morgan has agreed to pay $25 million to settle federal regulators’ allegations that it improperly used distributions of hot new stocks to certain customers to get them to buy additional shares. J.P. Morgan neither admitted to nor denied the allegations made in a civil lawsuit by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The big Wall Street firm also agreed to refrain from further violations in the settlement, which is subject to approval by a federal court in Washington. The violations of securities laws and brokerage industry rules allegedly occurred in 1999 and 2000, during the height of the tech-stock boom and the frenzy of initial public offerings of stock, known as IPOs. The SEC and the disciplinary arm of the National Association of Securities Dealers, the brokerage industry’s self-policing group, have been investigating Wall Street’s dealings in IPOs for nearly two years. J.P. Morgan induced some institutional customers that had received IPO stock from the firm to purchase additional shares during the new issue’s first few public trading days, the SEC said. The rules against such conduct are designed to prevent the artificial pumping up of stock prices through purchases that are induced. “This case is yet another example of the (SEC’s) resolve to vigorously enforce those rules designed to ensure that the IPO allocation process and IPO market are fair to all investors,” SEC enforcement director Stephen Cutler said. He said the case stands as a warning to all firms like J.P. Morgan that finance issues of stock that “they cannot engage in conduct that could distort the market for IPO stocks.” The SEC suit did not name any individuals at J.P. Morgan. It was the second major enforcement action against the firm involving IPOs. In February, J.P. Morgan agreed to pay $6 million to settle allegations that its Hambrecht & Quist investment bank got inflated commissions from customers who improperly received IPOs. The firm, which also was censured, neither admitted to nor denied the allegations by the National Association of Securities Dealers. The violations by Hambrecht & Quist allegedly occurred from November 1999 to March 2000, before J.P. Morgan acquired the San Francisco-based firm. In a similar case in January, FleetBoston Financial Corp. agreed to pay $28 million to settle the NASD’s allegations that its Robertson Stephens investment bank got inflated commissions in exchange for improperly distributing IPOs to customers. And last year, Wall Street firm Credit Suisse First Boston agreed to pay $100 million to resolve regulators’ allegations of abuses in its distribution of IPOs. Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.