Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
In an apparent case of first impression under Pennsylvania's Medical Care Availabilty and Reduction of Error Act, a Philadephia judge found that an infectious disease expert's testimony against a neurosurgeon admissible in a medical malpractice case. The judge ruled that a doctor who practices in a specialty area that is different from that of the defendant's may still provide expert testimony if both professionals treat the same disease.
August 27, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS