X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A superhero showdown takes place in Los Angeles on Monday. The creators of Spider-Man and the studio that took him to the big screen in 2002 head for a court hearing. Marvel Enterprises Inc. claims Sony Pictures Entertainment has not lived up to its licensing deal, and attached the agreement and other sensitive documents to its pleadings. Sony says publication of those papers would give Hollywood competitors an advantage, and wants the case decided in arbitration. L.A.’s O’Donnell & Shaeffer represents Marvel, while Sony tapped Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro. … The diabetes drug Rezulin continues to cause problems. On Friday the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals revived a high-stakes suit against Rezulin manufacturer Warner-Lambert Co. Rezulin was approved in 1997, though one National Institutes of Health scientist was forced to step down when it was revealed he had a financial stake in the drug’s success, and Rezulin was blamed for several deaths due to liver damage before it had been on the market a year. Rezulin was recalled in 2000, and later health insurers sued for the $1.4 billion they claim to have spent buying the drug for patients. A trial judge threw out the claim, saying health benefits providers were not directly harmed. Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi wrote that the lower court relied on the wrong standard. … Judicial nominations have devolved into partisan squabbling, so why not make it a game? UC Berkeley Professor Stephen Choi and Georgetown Law Center’s G. Mitu Gulati, in an upcoming California Law Review article, propose a tournament where circuit judges are ranked according to opinions published, cited and so forth, before being considered for the Supreme Court. The proposal would take a lot of the politics out of nominations — and that’s why it will never work. – From the editors of American Lawyer Media Related links: Sony, Marvel Tangled in ‘Spider-Man’ Legal Web Caesar Desiano and Gloria Desiano v. Warner-Lambert Co. A Tournament of Judges?

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.