Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Washington politicians would make a grave mistake in crafting new copy-protection laws based on Internet patterns today, an influential Stanford law professor warned. The professor, Lawrence Lessig, pointed out Wednesday that millions of consumers are downloading music and other materials onto their computers because slow dial-up connections make it tough to stream content quickly to a variety of devices. That’s bound to change within a few years as connections get faster, he said, making today’s debate irrelevant. “In the future, it will be easier to pay for subscription services than to be an amateur database administrator who moves content from device to device,” Lessig said. “We’re legislating against a background of the Internet’s current architecture of content distribution, and this is a fundamental mistake.” At a heated Digital Rights Summit at Intel Corp.’s Santa Clara, Calif., headquarters, Lessig joined entrepreneurs and other academics in warning that Hollywood’s copy-protection demands could strike a lethal blow to the U.S. technology industry. Punctuated by hisses, applause and shouts of “Amen!” from members of the 100-person crowd, the four-hour debate illustrated the gargantuan gap between Silicon Valley and Hollywood when it comes to so-called digital rights management. California entrepreneurs say Hollywood’s insistence on embedding anti-copying technology in devices would crimp product innovation in the flagging technology sector. Executives at startups say they have lost manufacturing contracts and venture capital funding because of the mere threat of litigation from the entertainment industry. The lone Hollywood defender in the four-hour conference blasted technophiles’ allegations as “overblown and simplistic.” Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., said Silicon Valley’s complaints were little more than trivial self-pity. Berman, who said he felt “like France at a meeting of the United Nations Security Council,” is the author of legislation that would give the entertainment industry broad new powers — including deliberately interfering with file-sharing programs — to try to stop online piracy. He said digital rights has become a smoke screen for discussing financial excess of Silicon Valley in the late 1990s and the realities of the industry’s slump. “Let’s have some perspective,” he said. “This issue is not as bad as 45 million people living without health insurance.” Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.