X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Federal and state appellate courts have embraced the Internet. The U.S. Supreme Court and all the U.S. courts of appeals have Web sites, and that also holds true for most state appellate court systems. But while federal and state appellate courts have not hesitated to establish a presence on the Web, the quality of the features that those Web sites offer varies widely. This column discusses in descending order of importance the features that appellate court Web sites should offer. Before concluding, I mention some of the best and worst appellate Web sites in existence. Features that an appellate court Web site should offer: • Access to the court’s opinions. Nearly every federal and state appellate court Web site offers easy access to the court’s recent precedential opinions. One noteworthy exception is the Web site of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which makes it next to impossible to access online that court’s opinions. I prefer appellate court Web sites that provide opinions in PDF format, which allows the online version to look exactly like the printed pamphlets in which the courts issue their opinions to the parties and the public. The U.S. Supreme Court posts its opinions online in this format, as do numerous federal appellate courts. Other users of appellate court Web sites prefer being able to access opinions in HTML format. Several federal appellate court Web sites — the 1st and 10th Circuits, for example — provide access to opinions in both HTML and PDF format. Other appellate court Web sites, particularly state appellate court sites, make opinions available online only in Microsoft Word format. Those opinions are not easily accessible through a Web browser and can be inaccessible to users whose computers run operating systems other than Microsoft Windows. In my view, appellate court Web sites should post online not only precedential but also non-precedential opinions. Many federal appellate court Web sites already do so, and a federal law enacted last year, � 205 of the E-Government Act of 2002, requires that all federal appellate court Web sites post both published and unpublished rulings online starting sometime within the next two to three years. The 8th Circuit’s Web site is to be applauded for posting a summary of each opinion along with a link to it. The California Supreme Court’s Web site goes one step further, providing a preview that lists the cases in which opinions will issue the next day and the questions presented in those cases. Some appellate court Web sites — for example, the 10th Circuit’s site — only offer opinions online for the first 90 days after issuance. Other sites, including the 3rd Circuit’s, issue opinions bearing a Web address that changes when the opinion is moved into the Web site’s opinion archive. Because the archive address works from day one, the opinions should bear that address from the outset. The 8th Circuit has what is probably one of the best search engines for finding opinions. You can search by name of the authoring judge or dissenting judge, and you can search for words in the opinion or the case summary. I also have come to appreciate the usefulness of the online search engines that the 5th and 9th Circuits provide, even though they lack some of the bells and whistles present at the 8th Circuit’s Web site. • Access to the appellate court’s rules, procedures and forms. Most every federal and state appellate court Web site provides online access to the court’s rules of procedure and practice. Some sites provide rules as a single lengthy document, while others allow for individual rules to be accessed separately. While most courts are already making their rules available online, many can make the rules easier to locate from the court’s main page. Attorneys who handle appeals infrequently may find an appellate court’s rules governing the briefing process difficult to understand in the abstract. The most helpful appellate court Web sites provide checklists of briefing requirements. Some courts even provide explanatory guides or examples of briefs and appendices that meet the appellate court’s rules and requirements. Appellate courts should also provide online access to forms that attorneys likely will need to file during an appeal. The 3rd Circuit makes available at its Web site a very comprehensive collection of forms and serves as a good example of what all appellate courts ought to do. • Access to appellate docket entries. One of the greatest services that an appellate court’s Web site can provide is free and easy access to the docket entries in the cases pending before the court. The U.S. Supreme Court and many state appellate courts make online docket access available. Unfortunately, several years ago the Judicial Conference of the United States — the governing body of the federal judicial system — adopted a rule that requires U.S. courts of appeals and U.S. district courts to charge a fee for docket access of 7 cents per page. While that fee may seem paltry, users cannot access online dockets unless they have an account to which those charges can be billed. As a result, many lawyers and members of the public cannot take advantage of the ease of access that online docket entries provide. Instead, these users need to pick up the phone and call the federal court’s staff to learn what the court’s online docket reflects. One notable exception is the 7th Circuit, which has elected not to charge any fee for online access to its docket. As a consequence, the 7th Circuit receives relatively less financial support from the U.S. courts system than do other lower federal courts, but in exchange, it earns the unending gratitude of online appellate practitioners and pro se litigants everywhere. • Telephone and address contact information and directions to the court. Appellate court Web sites are exceptionally easy to find online through Google or most other search engines. As a result, many lawyers and pro se litigants visit an appellate court’s Web site first before picking up the telephone to call an appellate court’s clerk’s office with a question. But no matter how much information an appellate court’s Web site provides, there will always be instances when the answer is not there or cannot easily be found. Thus, an appellate court’s Web site should provide a list of telephone numbers and addresses of employees who are available to answer case-related questions from lawyers and the public. In addition, an appellate court’s Web site should provide driving, parking and mass transit instructions for the court’s location or locations. • Information about the appellate judges serving on the court. Most every appellate court Web site provides at least a list, often in seniority order, of the judges serving on the court. But much more useful than a simple list of names is a page that provides each judge’s biography and photograph. Many state appellate court Web sites provide this information. The 2nd and 5th Circuits provide biographical information about their judges, but no photos, at their Web sites. The 9th Circuit, by contrast, boasts the largest number of judges serving on any single federal appellate court and yet has a Web site that makes it nearly impossible to determine in which city and state its various judges are based. • A listing of oral argument dates, the cases to be argued on those dates, and the judges who will be hearing the arguments. Some appellate court Web sites provide this information, but many do not. The Pennsylvania Superior Court posts an entire calendar year’s worth of oral argument dates along with the judges who have been assigned to hear arguments at each session throughout the year. Other courts are a bit more reluctant to release far in advance the names of the judges who will be hearing arguments on a given day. The 3rd Circuit, for example, does not release the identities of the judges who will be hearing oral argument on a given day until about two weeks in advance of an argument. But once that information is available, the 3rd Circuit usually posts it online. • Extra goodies that appellate court Web sites can (and some already do) offer. Both the 7th and 8th Circuits, at their Web sites, provide access to the full text of appellate briefs filed with the court and to audiotapes of appellate oral arguments. An employee of the 8th Circuit has told me that approximately 1,000 users listen online to that court’s oral arguments each month. The U.S. Supreme Court makes written transcripts of its oral arguments available online, and the Florida Supreme Court provides live and archived video access to its oral arguments. Some appellate court Web sites allow users to sign up for e-mail notification of docket activity in an appeal or for e-mail notification of an opinion’s issuance. I have received e-mail notification of rulings in appeals where I represented parties, and it is nice to know immediately when the result is good news. If the e-mail brings not so good news, at least you learn that much sooner in advance of the deadline for reconsideration or appeal to a higher court. In the future, more appellate courts may begin using RSS/XML feeds, which allow Web users to receive updates from countless Web sites with the press of a single button. The Supreme Judicial Court of West Virginia already provides this feature. Last but not least, once an appellate court has made available over the Web all the content that appellate lawyers and the public require to interact with the court, the court should consider posting interesting historical information about itself, its former judges and its courthouses. THE 2003 BEST AND WORST APPELLATE COURT WEB SITES The 7th and 8th Circuits operate the two best federal appellate court Web sites currently in existence. The 8th Circuit is to be applauded because it has a wonderful search feature, it makes all opinions — published and unpublished — available, and it provides access to briefs and oral argument audiotapes. The 7th Circuit offers most of those features, too, but no access to unpublished opinions. Yet, the 7th Circuit’s site makes up for the lack of access to unpublished opinions by providing free access to docket entries and a whole bunch of helpful guides, including one that recommends the best typefaces to use in appellate briefs. The award for the worst federal appellate court Web site goes to the 11th Circuit, at least until that court finds a way to make its opinions easily available online as every other federal appellate court long ago managed to do. True, the 11th Circuit’s Web site looks quite nice, but content is king. I have not visited enough state appellate court Web sites to announce with confidence which are the best and the worst. But I can recommend without hesitation three that are very, very good. Those are the Web sites of the Florida Supreme Court, the North Dakota Supreme Court and the Supreme Judicial Court of West Virginia. These three state appellate court Web sites give the best federal appellate court Web sites a run for their money. Howard J. Bashman is a shareholder in the law firm of Buchanan Ingersoll, chairman of its appellate group and co-chairman of the Philadelphia Bar Association’s appellate courts committee. He can be reached at (215) 665-3872 and at [email protected]. You can access his appellate Web log at appellateblog.blogspot.com.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.