X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Wednesday tried to clear up what’s required of companies when they sit on a body that sets standards for a particular industry. In a high-profile case involving Los Altos, Calif., computer memory developer Rambus Inc., a three-member panel said a company need only disclose patents and applications that specifically pertain to the standards being set by the body. That’s a big win for Rambus, which has been accused by the Federal Trade Commission of antitrust violations for not revealing all of the patents it held while it sat on a standards-setting body for semiconductor technology. The case sets a new — and somewhat liberal — bar for corporations when they disclose their patents. In an opinion by Judge Randall Rader, the court clarified that a participant in a standards-setting body is required to disclose only claims in patents and applications that “reasonably might be necessary to practice the standard.” Rader concluded that Rambus did so as it sat on the Joint Electron Devices Engineering Council, the organization that develops standards for semiconductor technologies. “This decision will be required reading among standard-setting bodies around the country,” said John Danforth, Rambus general counsel. The court’s ruling “endorses a broad reading” of the Rambus patent, Danforth said. It also frees the company from “a terrible cloud of fraud” relating to its participation on the standards-setting body. The case has been closely watched by the tech industry, as several companies have been embroiled in litigation with Rambus. The company does not manufacture its own computer memory devices but develops and licenses technologies to companies that manufacture semiconductor memory. In this instance, Rambus had sued Germany’s Infineon Technologies AG and its subsidiaries over patents related to dynamic random access memory (DRAM) technology. Rambus said Infineon had infringed its patents. A Virginia U.S. district court found in Infineon’s favor. But the Federal Circuit ruled that the lower court erred in its interpretation of patent claims. Specifically, it disagreed with the construction of certain terms in the patents, such as “integrated circuit device” and “bus.” The court also criticized the standards- setting body — the JEDEC — for not having clear policies. “In this case there is a staggering lack of defining details in the � patent policy,” Rader wrote. “When direct competitors participate in an open standards committee, their work necessitates a written patent policy with clear guidance on the committee’s intellectual property position.” The court reversed the $2.4 million fraud verdict against Rambus and vacated the award of $7 million in attorney fees to Infineon. Judge Sharon Prost dissented from a portion of the fraud ruling. In her dissent, Prost said “substantial evidence supports the jury’s verdict that Rambus committed actual fraud under Virginia state law” by withholding information when JEDEC was setting a standard for certain semiconductor technology. Infineon’s attorneys, Kenneth Starr and Christopher Landau, partners in the Washington, D.C., office of Kirkland & Ellis, could not be reached for comment. But Infineon’s Leslie Davis said the company is reviewing the court’s decision and expects “to request a rehearing with the Federal Circuit.”

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.