Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
A drug-testing company whose nurses botched four clinical trials by fudging paperwork is entitled to insurance coverage under an employee dishonesty policy -- even if the employees had nothing to gain and honestly believed they were doing nothing wrong -- because motive and intent are "irrelevant to the concept of dishonesty," the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in reversing a summary judgment in favor of the insurer.
December 31, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS