Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A federal rules advisory committee has approved a proposal to allow the citation of unpublished decisions in all federal appellate courts. Although the precise wording is yet to be worked out, the measure would allow the citation of unpublished opinions solely for persuasive value. The rule still has at least two years to go before it is written into the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Meeting in San Francisco, the 10-member Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules passed the measure with just one dissenting vote — Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach partner Sanford Svetcov. Even if it is ultimately enacted, the rule is still a long way off. It must be subjected to a public comment period and ultimately approved by the U.S. Judicial Council and the U.S. Supreme Court. Federal appellate courts are divided on how to treat unpublished opinions. Many allow lawyers to cite them in briefs, even if they don’t have precedential value. However, the proposed rule contravenes the rule in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, one of several to bar their citation. The move was praised by critics of unpublished opinions. “This presumably puts some pressure on … circuits to allow citation,” said Stephen Barnett, a professor at University of California, Berkeley’s Boalt Hall School of Law. Barnett said the proposed rule was first floated by former Solicitor General Seth Waxman as a way to synthesize the rules among circuits. “That’s the main purpose of this proposal — to gain uniformity,” Barnett said. However, the current Solicitor General, Theodore Olson, abstained from Monday’s 7-1 vote. His representative, Deputy Associate Attorney General Douglas Letter, told the committee Olson had concerns about the rule, which were apparently highlighted during a phone call from 9th Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski. “Olson’s representative said Olson had heard from Judge Kozinski and now had some concerns,” Barnett said. Kozinski declined to comment extensively on Monday’s vote. “We have a rule, and it’s a good rule,” Kozinski said. He also declined to say whether he contacted members of the advisory committee. “What communications I have with other people is not a matter for public discussion,” he said. Svetcov said he opposed the rule for two reasons: Judges, he said, often sign on to unpublished opinions for the result, not necessarily the reasoning. Thus, lawyers end up citing opinions that have flawed reasoning. The second reason has to do with the first — if judges worry about the reasonings in unpublished opinions, they may pay more attention to them at the expense of published law. And although Svetcov said some circuits may need more law, that is not the case in the 9th, which is the largest appellate court in the country. “We’ve got thousands of cases,” Svetcov said. Michael Schmier, a longtime opponent of unpublished opinions, said he was pleased with Monday’s vote. “I think that they’re making progress in changing policy,” Schmier said. “The decision’s been made to go in the direction I’ve been saying they should go for years.”

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.