A Manhattan judge has declined to allow expert testimony on eyewitness identifications in a murder trial, finding that studies on the issue are so conflicting that the jurors should not be subjected to them. The ruling, which was issued after the holding of a Frye hearing, represents the most extensive judicial examination of eyewitness testimony as science. It also contrasts with rulings in other cases.
September 16, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Georgia.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
McGovern Legal Services, LLC seeks an attorney to join our team at our North Brunswick office working with Condominium Associations, Homeown...
Mineola firm with national practice seeks talented, experienced (3-5 years post-admission) attorneys withdeposition experience to handle com...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
Lawrence Law LLC congratulates Jeralyn Lawrence, Esq. on her upcoming installation as President of the New Jersey State Bar Association
RAYNES & LAWN is Proud to Welcome Next Generation to the Firm