X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Handing President George W. Bush a stinging defeat, a bitterly divided Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday rejected on a strict party-line vote the nomination of Priscilla Owen for a judgeship on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Owen, a justice of the Texas Supreme Court, became the second Bush judicial nominee to be defeated by the same 10-9 vote in the Democrat-controlled committee. Charles Pickering Sr., also a choice for the 5th Circuit, was voted down. Committee Republicans, pointing out that Owen was unanimously rated “well qualified” by the American Bar Association, said the committee had “crossed a major line” into out-and-out partisanship in rejecting the nominee. “This is a changing of the ground rules. This politicizes the judiciary itself,” said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. “I don’t think the Democratic members understand the risk we are taking when we make politics and ideology a part of the confirmation process.” During the hearing, Republican staffers passed out a statement by Sen. Zell Miller, D-Ga., supporting Owen. Had the nomination reached the floor, and had Miller joined all 49 Senate Republicans in supporting Owen, she would have been confirmed. But in addition to voting not to support the Owen nomination, the committee voted 10-9 not to send it to the floor with a neutral or negative recommendation. Democrats and liberal activists hailed the vote as the rejection of a judge who, although highly intelligent and the possessor of a stellar r�sum�, was also an “extremist” and a “conservative judicial activist.” Owen, 47, was criticized by abortion rights and women’s groups for her opinions as a Texas judge in a series of so-called parental notification cases. In a dozen appeals in 2000, young women sought the court’s permission to have abortions without notifying their parents, and Owen frequently took the view that the teen-agers had not shown a good reason for their requests to be granted under a state law. Owen was also assailed by labor, environmental and consumer groups for allegedly siding consistently with business interests against injured persons and consumers since she took the bench in 1994. At the nearly two-hour committee meeting, Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said that President Bush “has often spoken of judicial activism without acknowledging that ends-oriented decision making can come easily to ideologically chosen conservative nominees.” “In the case of Priscilla Owen, we see a perfect example of such an approach to the law,” Leahy said. “This is a difficult vote for me,” acknowledged Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. “I have never voted against a woman before. I have met Priscilla Owen, and I like her very much. But a consumer attorney from Texas told me that there is not a single consumer-rights attorney in the state who feels he’d get a fair shake in her courtroom.” Nan Aron, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Alliance for Justice and a leading Owen opponent, said the committee had sent a strong signal to President Bush that only more moderate nominees will survive the process. “The committee is to be commended for engaging in careful review of Justice Owen’s record and for its decision to withhold its consent,” said Aron. “The message to the White House is that if they send up acceptable judges, they will be confirmed, but those beholden to special interests will be defeated.”

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.