Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CROPS U.S. Patent No. 4,940,835; 5,188,642; 5,484,956 Issued:Three key patents: Two issued to Dilip Shah and others, one in July 1990 and one in February 1993; one issued January 1996 to Ronald Lundquist and David Walters Assigned tMonsanto Corp. (Shah patents); Dekalb Genetics Corp. (Lundquist patent) Prosecuted by:In-house at Monsanto (Shah patents); Minneapolis’s Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner (Lundquist patent) The idea of genetically engineered crops may still seem futuristic (if not a little bit frightening), but genetically altered corn, cotton, soybeans and more have already invaded the fields, the factories and, chances are, your dinner table. In short — you’ve eaten the stuff. By inserting specific genes into plants, scientists can make crops that do all sorts of newfangled things, like fight off pests and tolerate herbicides that kill weeds. The technology has been embraced by American farmers — genetically altered soybeans now account for 74 percent of the crop, and modified corn 32 percent, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Monsanto Co.’s patents cover a technology used in roughly 80 percent of all genetically engineered crops. The technology makes seeds resistant to the weed killer glyphosate, marketed — also by Monsanto — under the brand name “Roundup.” The modification allows farmers to kill weeds without killing their crops, as well. Monsanto’s patents did more than spur sales of weed killer; they spurred other genetic modifications, including techniques that boost the nutritional content of foods, or allow them to grow better in hostile environments (a boon in many areas plagued by famine). Ronald Lundquist’s patent gives us corn that contains a gene from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), a soil bacterium that makes a toxin deadly to corn-eating insects. That means less corn for the bugs, more corn for us. Despite reassurances from the U.S. Department of Agriculture that biotech foods are safe for human consumption, many consumers remain wary, labeling the technology “genetic pollution,” and arguing that its long-term effects haven’t been adequately studied. The European Union halted biotech product approvals in 1998. Moreover, the poorest farmers — those most in need of the bionic crops — are often unable to afford the patented seeds. As the use of modified seeds increases, so, too, will the debate. Alan Cohen is a free-lance writer based in New York City. His e-mail is [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.