X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Twenty-nine states sued Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. on Tuesday, accusing the maker of the cancer drug Taxol of fraudulently keeping less-expensive generic versions off the market. The lawsuit alleged that the pharmaceutical company obtained patents for Taxol under false pretenses and used those patents to delay generic versions from coming on to the market by at least 2 1/2 years. Generic versions were first introduced last year. The delay forced hospitals, cancer patients and states to pay almost 30 percent more for the medicine, which is widely used to fight breast and ovarian cancer, the lawsuit said. Taxol treatments generally cost $6,000 to $10,000 per patient. The states, led by Ohio, are seeking unspecified damages. “These marketplace practices have had a dramatic impact on the ability of people and health care systems to obtain affordable, effective drugs,” said Ohio Attorney General Betty Montgomery. Taxol is derived from the bark of the Pacific yew tree and was discovered by the taxpayer-funded National Cancer Institute, which licensed the drug to Bristol-Myers. First approved in 1992 as second-line therapy for advanced ovarian or breast cancer, Taxol today is also used against AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma and lung cancer. Robert Laverty, a Bristol-Myers spokesman, said the states were merely joining litigation brought years ago by generic drug makers. He said only: “We will continue to deal with the issues raised by this new suit, as we have been doing with other litigation related to these matters.” The lawsuit said the company acknowledged in 1993 that the drug’s active ingredient, a naturally occurring substance called paclitaxel, could not be patented. However, Bristol-Myers filed patent applications. The company withheld documents about Taxol from the patent process and misrepresented information about the drug, the lawsuit said. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in the District of Columbia. Joining Ohio as plaintiffs were Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. Copyright 2002 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.