X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
John Tredennick has yet to take office as chair of the American Bar Association’s 18,093-member Law Practice Management section — that happens in August — but he’s already shaking up the place. Tredennick, a partner at Holland & Hart and CEO of its tech spin-off, CaseShare Systems Inc., (and a member of the Law Technology News Editorial Advisory Board), recently sent a missive to the section’s active members that measured 8.0 on the ABA’s Richter scale. Tredennick says he wants to refocus the section back to the core themes of technology, marketing, management and finance. And he warned “actives” (the 180+ members who actively participate in section matters, including 22 LPM Council members) that they may no longer be eligible for their cherished reimbursements for airfare and hotel costs to attend section meetings. Tredennick says he won’t take reimbursements next year for the four major meetings, and urges his colleagues to follow suit and look to their employers to support their ABA activities. During his regime, Tredennick said, reimbursements will be prioritized toward those who work hard and produce direct benefits and revenue to the section. (The incoming chair prepares the budget with the finance committee and in consultation with leaders, the Council approves it.) Tredennick says he has no choice. The section, he says, is just about flat broke. LPM’s annual budget is approximately $3 million, and expected revenues from dues and its annual ABA Techshow are about equal to the fixed costs to run the section, he said. Section dues are $40, plus ABA dues, typically $295. TRIM AND CUT LPM, which traditionally has been heavily focused on legal technology, holds four major meetings each year; one at the ABA Annual, for which no one is reimbursed; one at ABA midyear; and two Council meetings. Typically, actives are reimbursed for supersaver airfare, $100 per day for hotel and meals, and $40 for ground transportation. At the 2002 midyear meeting, 115 actives were authorized for reimbursement, most for three days, according to ABA documents. Tredennick charged section leaders to trim budgets, raise funds, and cut reimbursements, and to rethink the need quarterly meetings. “For the past 10 years, [reimbursement] has been the sine qua non of active membership,” he observed, noting that staff has advised him point-blank that actives would only attend meetings if reimbursed. “We won’t survive as a section on that path,” Tredennick warns. “Our members (mostly non-active) provide most of the operating funds. They expect us to use those funds carefully and wisely,” he said. “The members don’t expect me to spend their dues on vacations for our inactive actives.” Few actives will talk on the record about the memo, but private e-mails have been flying. There appear to be three main issues: the LPM budget, the impact on small firm practitioners and LPM’s reputation. The section, while receiving accolades for its tech activities and publications, for years has been chided by ABA critics as a “political playpen” that caters to a small group of in-fighting actives. There’s also a fair amount of resentment about the paid-for travel to spectacular venues. The section regularly meets at “destination” spots, such as Florida beaches, the Oregon coast, and Asheville, N.C., (home of the Vanderbilt estate). But when the section’s general membership picks up the tab, it’s easy to see why “taxpayer” critics get grumpy. Some actives say the resort issue is a red herring. Resorts are usually cheaper than major metropolitan areas, they argue. In fact, Tredennick had suggested Bermuda for a Council meeting, but ruled it out in favor of San Juan, P.R., after initial investigations determined that airfare and hotels would be too costly. The Puerto Rico location, while a beach, offers airfare and hotel rates much less expensive than many other U.S. destinations, he said. But now, in light of the request for employers to pick up tabs, the “free vacation” perception issue is even more touchy. Some actives expressed hesitation to push their bosses to pay for a trip to a beach. So Tredennick’s now exploring other venues. MUCH TO GAIN The section has much to gain if employers start picking up the tab for actives’ participation, proponents argue. Not only would it significantly help the LPM budget, but it would go a long way to refute critics, and help attract new members and new actives, they say. But some say privately that they worry that the change in policy could impact small firm attorneys or actives who work for non-profits or schools. Some suggest that meetings be routinely held in Chicago, the ABA’s headquarters (which would cut staff expenses), or near major airports, in order to minimize the inconvenience and expense to participants. Among those praising Tredennick is Phil Shuey, an active who serves on several committees. “I would far rather support the expenses of a member who is contributing to the botttom line more than their costs, than others who are not contributing to that revenue stream!” In fact, some actives argue that existing reimbursements are too frugal, and are driving away potential leaders who don’t want to, or can’t, absorb the costs. Loren Jones, a member of the Law Technology News Editorial Advisory Board, is a new solo (formerly with West Group) who has not been reimbursed. “Like most volunteer organizations, 1 percent do the work the other 99 percent take for granted,” he observes. “Every meeting entails giving up billable time, so adding travel expenses on top of lost billable time seems to me to be asking a lot of the volunteers.” But just about everybody was sympathetic to the dilemma. “I would hope folks understand that John is trying to address the financial reality of the section,” said active Jeff Flax.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.