X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Tyson Foods Inc. continued its campaign Monday to void a landmark Delaware Court of Chancery opinion, telling the state supreme court that it should review the poultry giant’s appeal. “This court should hear the merits of Tyson’s entire appeal,” the company said in a 38-page brief. Tyson wants to void Vice Chancellor Leo E. Strine’s 2001 opinion in IBP v. Tyson as part of its defense of a class action filed by IBP shareholders. They lost money selling their stock after the Fayetteville, Ark.-based company improperly aborted the acquisition. Investors may use many of Strine’s findings against the company in the litigation, including the judge’s conclusion that Tyson suffered from “buyer’s remorse” after acquiring IBP for $4.7 billion in January 2001. Court rules would bar Tyson from refuting any of Strine’s conclusions unless it can vacate the opinion. The appeal is drawing unusual attention because Strine’s IBP v. Tyson decision is considered seminal. The judge addresses when a deterioration in a company’s finances constitutes a “material adverse change.” Strine essentially set a high standard for triggering a so-called MAC clause, which has made it more difficult for acquirers to back out of deals. If Tyson succeeds on appeal, Strine’s decision could no longer be cited as guidance in interpreting MAC clauses. The appeal centers on whether Tyson forfeited its right to appeal the bulk of its case. Lawyers for the investors argued in an April 29 filing that Strine issued a final order in IBP v. Tyson in August, which meant the 30-day window for appeals expired in September. The only item before the justices is Tyson’s appeal of Strine’s refusal to vacate his June ruling, they said. But Tyson said Monday that Strine did not enter a final order in August, arguing that the judge only issued an order resolving a separate stockholder issue. The court could not enter a final order because all potential disputes between Tyson and IBP had not been resolved, the company said. The potential need for Strine’s intervention did not end until Tyson closed the IBP purchase Sept. 28, Tyson said. Once that happened, the company moved for final judgment and to vacate the IBP-Tyson decision as moot. Tyson also argued that without supreme court review, it risks having the opinion used against it in federal court despite never having had a chance to appeal the decision. It also said the appeal is worth hearing because Strine formulated “unprecedented” rules regarding MAC clauses. After agreeing to buy IBP, Tyson voided the pact in March 2001, arguing that IBP misled it by hiding the extent of its troubles. Strine sided with IBP in June 2001, ordering Tyson to complete the deal. Rather than appeal, Tyson settled the case with IBP by agreeing to acquire the meat packer. Copyright (c)2002 TDD, LLC. All rights reserved.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.