Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Two broad coalitions of civil liberties groups, library associations, Web sites and individual library patrons are planning to challenge a new federal law that mandates the use of filtering software for computers or Internet access in schools and libraries receiving federal grants. The coalitions are aiming to file twin lawsuits in a Philadelphia federal court March 20. The Children’s Internet Protection Act, which Congress passed late last year, requires schools and libraries to install “technology protection measures” to shield minors from adult content. Hailed by conservatives, the law endured stiff opposition from civil liberties and library groups. It passed only after being tacked onto a critical appropriations bill during last year’s lame-duck session of the 106th Congress. Both lawsuits, which will attempt to have the new law struck down on First Amendment and due-process grounds, will be filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia, according to sources involved in their preparation. One lawsuit, spearheaded by the American Civil Liberties Union, will include a wide range of plaintiffs, such as county and state library associations, individual library patrons, and several Web sites whose content involves reproductive choice, safe sex, gay and lesbian issues and art blocked by filtering software. Other library groups and individual patrons will join the other lawsuit, led by the American Library Association. The court is expected to combine the lawsuits. Meanwhile, the Federal Communications Commission is preparing to issue a ruling by April 20 that would outline the steps that schools and libraries participating in the federal E-rate program, a $2.25 billion annual subsidy of Internet access, must take under the new law. Under the CIPA provisions, a three-judge panel comprised of two district judges and one appellate judge will hear the lawsuits. Any appeal of the panel’s verdict must be made to the U.S. Supreme Court. The law’s supporters said that a mandate is needed to combat an epidemic of minors accessing adult content on computers at schools and libraries. Opponents counter that filtering software is a clumsy, subjective tool that all too often blocks harmless Web sites. Furthermore, opponents said, a government-imposed mandate is a poor substitute for parental supervision, private use of filters and public education efforts. The upcoming legal challenge will be merely the latest in a string of courtroom battles regarding decency laws in the digital age. The ACLU has until April 16 to reply to a recent Justice Department petition asking the Supreme Court to overturn a June 2000 appeals court decision that the Child Online Privacy Act, a 1998 Internet decency law, is unconstitutional. In June 1997, the Supreme Court ruled that a 1996 law, the Communications Decency Act, was unconstitutional. Both of those earlier cases also originated in the Philadelphia federal court. In January, the Supreme Court said it would hear a case regarding the 1996 Child Pornography Protection Act. In that case, the Justice Department is appealing a December 1999 decision by a 9th Circuit federal appeals panel, which held that criminalizing computerized images of child pornography that don’t involve real children is unconstitutional. Related Articles from The Industry Standard: Anti-Porn Commission Heads for Congress The High Cost of COPPA Online Child Porn Act Ruled Unconstitutional Copyright � 2001 The Industry Standard

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.