X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
I am surprised that Tony Mauro stated in his article, “Supreme Court Case Disappears During Oral Arguments”, that I was unavailable for comment following the argument in the United States Supreme Court in the case of Shaw v. Murphy. After all, we were in the same room. Mauro finds it curious that I would concede the question, which was crafted by the petitioner, not by me, of whether a prisoner enjoyed “an independent, free-standing right to give legal advice.” The tactic of stating the question so that one answer to the question is untenable, is not a new one. The affirmative answer to the question would have been untenable, which is why I conceded it. Mauro forgets that I represented the respondent in the case. We had won in the 9th Circuit. To defend the undefendable was to offer the Court the opportunity to reverse the 9th Circuit, throwing my client out of court altogether. The Court, after all, did not grant cert because they wanted to fall all over themselves giving a convicted felon a new right. Two outcomes were wins for my client: affirming the 9th Circuit’s judgment or vacating the judgment and remanding. By declining the invitation to fight a battle on ground chosen by my opponents we increased the odds of a favorable outcome. In the end, Mauro’s article reflects something we should all remember. If you are going to Monday-morning quarterback, you should occasionally touch the ball. Jeffrey T. Renz University of Montana School of Law Missoula, Mont.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.