X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The subject of arbitrating discrimination claims was discussed at the National Employment Law Institute (NELI) Conference held in Chicago, Illinois on July 26 and 27, 2001. Speaking to an audience that consisted primarily of employers, attorneys and human resource professionals, Zachary Fasman, of the law firm Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker in New York, suggested the following ten recommendations for designing a successful arbitration program: -Always obtain a written agreement to arbitrate from employees. This agreement should be open and clear, not buried in the employee handbook; -Define the scope of arbitrable claims broadly; -Anticipate the likely defendants, including not just the company, but its affiliates, supervisors and benefit plans, and provide that they are third party beneficiaries to the arbitration promise; -Do not attempt to preclude employees from resorting to government agencies that have a state mandate, such as the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and its state and local affiliates, as well as state unemployment and workers’ compensation agencies; -Consider the risk of exempting from arbitration employer initiated injunctive actions, i.e., if the agreement allows only the employer to seek a judicial forum when it prefers that forum over arbitration while requiring the employee to arbitrate all claims, this section of the agreement will likely be voided by courts as unconscionable or unenforceable; -Resist overreaching by purporting to foreclose remedies, e.g., by attempting to insulate the company from Title VII damages, thus creating an impermissible waiver of Title VII rights; -Resist overreaching by unconscionably shortening the statute of limitations; -Resist overreaching through inequitable apportionment of costs and fees involved in the arbitration process; -Consider reserving certain appellate rights, such as drafting the agreement to include a limited form of appellate review should an arbitrator’s decision seem aberrational; -Avoid overreaching in implementation, i.e., calculate the various risks of, for example, (1) presenting the document on a “sign or be fired” basis, (2) failing to discuss the agreement until the employee’s first day at work or (3) implementing the program differently than written.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.