X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
In the 1980s, Melbourne, Fla.-based Harris Corp. was awarded two patents for infrastructure equipment used in cellular phone systems. The technology takes a signal from a mobile phone and assigns it to a channel, which then communicates with a network. One patent covered digital cellular technology; the other, analog. In 1995, Harris entered into a joint venture with MLMC Ltd. to pursue licensing opportunities and initiate litigation over the patents. MLMC sued Verizon Wireless, Alltel Corp., Airtouch Corp., GT Wireless and other cellphone firms, charging that they had infringed on the patents by purchasing and using equipment manufactured by Lucent Technologies Inc. The plaintiff sued the end users, not Lucent. Before trial, Judge Sue Robinson of the U.S. District Court in the District of Delaware summarily dismissed the claim over the digital patent, leaving only the analog patent at issue. The defendants denied infringement, contending that the Harris system was different from the traditional approach developed by Bell Labs, which involved the use of a base station controller. The Harris system eliminated the base station controller. To prove their point, the defendants deposed the Harris inventors, who all said that they had eliminated the base station controller. The defense also contended that the patent was invalid because Harris had marketed and sold the technology before it applied for the patent. MLMC wanted $271 million in royalties and an injunction. But on Dec. 4, a Delaware jury found no infringement and found the Harris patent invalid. The plaintiff will move for a ruling to set aside the verdict, for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict on invalidity and for a ruling of infringement as a matter of law. The plaintiff also will appeal the summary judgment finding. Plaintiff’s attorneys: Randy McClanahan, McClanahan & Clearman, Houston; Ed Goldstein and Ted Polasek, Goldstein & Polasek, Houston; Steven Margolin, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, Del. Defense attorneys: John M. Desmarais, Robert Appleby, Edward Donovan and Alan Kellman, Kirkland & Ellis, New York; Josy Ingersoll, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.