Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The California Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday that a former criminal defendant cannot sue his lawyer without a post-conviction exoneration. In Coscia v. McKenna & Cuneo, the justices reiterated an earlier ruling in which they held that actual innocence was required for legal malpractice claims. Chief Justice Ronald George wrote for the court that the rulings “avoid a potential adverse consequence of distinguishing between convictions based upon guilty pleas and convictions after trial.” He added, “If only the client who pleaded guilty could recover for malpractice without first obtaining post-conviction relief, attorneys might be tempted to practice defensive law when faced with the choice of advising a client to enter into a plea agreement or proceed to trial, in order to insulate themselves from malpractice actions.” Coscia stemmed from the criminal case of Nicholas Coscia, an attorney who pleaded guilty to one count of securities fraud. He was sentenced to two years’ probation and a $5,000 fine. He later sued his attorneys at Washington, D.C.-based McKenna & Cuneo on grounds that the firm gave him negligent legal advice. Ronald Mallen, a partner with Hinshaw & Culbertson in San Francisco who represented McKenna & Cuneo, called the ruling a victory for establishing an exoneration requirement. “But it’s got a catch to it,” he added, pointing to a section of the ruling addressing the new requirement’s effect on the statute of limitations. The justices directed trial courts to stay malpractice action during the period in which a plaintiff timely and diligently pursues post-conviction remedies. But Mallen said that rule could have the effect of “increasing the frequency of claims against criminal defense lawyers” because plaintiffs will feel they may as well file a claim within the one-year period just to preserve it for later.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.