Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Stanford Law School professor Lawrence Lessig lost round two in a legal battle to overturn a federal statute adding 20 years of protection to copyrighted works. In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld a lower court’s ruling that Congress acted within the bounds of the Constitution in passing the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998. Lessig had argued on behalf of Web site operator Eric Eldred and several other plaintiffs that the statute violates the First Amendment and is inconsistent with the constitutional requirement that copyrighted works be original and that copyright be secured for “limited times.” In the Friday decision in Eldred v. Reno, 99-5430, the appeals court rejected arguments that an extension violated First Amendment rights and basic copyright rules on originality. But its primary focus was on the Constitution’s copyright clause, which says copyrights endure only for “limited times.” Writing for the majority, Judge Douglas Ginsburg said the legislation was intended to match U.S. copyrights to the terms of copyrights granted by the European Union rather than as a step toward making copyrights perpetual. Judge David Sentelle dissented, saying “it is impossible that the framers of the Constitution contemplated permanent protection, either directly obtained or attained through the guise of progressive extension of existing copyrights.” Lessig could not be reached for comment. But Jonathan Zittrain, a professor at Harvard Law School who joined Lessig on the appellants brief with four other attorneys, said they are deciding whether to appeal to the full circuit court or directly to the Supreme Court. I. Fred Koenigsberg, a partner with New York’s White & Case and general counsel for the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, said the statute was supported by “every group of creators and copyright owners who you can imagine.” ASCAP, the Motion Picture Association of America and the Association of American Publishers signed a brief supporting the legislation.
Copyright Law in the New Millennium. March 20-April 2.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.