X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The National Lawyers Guild and three other activist groups involved in demonstrations at the Democratic National Convention last August have sued the city over police tactics. The federal complaint, filed in Los Angeles on Aug. 9, alleges that the Los Angeles Police Department has established policies to interfere with such political marches and rallies, including the use of force against peaceful demonstrators. National Lawyers Guild v. City of Los Angeles, CV-01-06877 (C.D. Calif.). The lawsuit, filed by attorneys for the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, describes the four alleged policies: to end or bar lawful demonstrations, to attack harmless protesters with nonlethal weapons, to prevent people from joining or leaving marches and rallies and to circle low-flying helicopters over demonstrations to silence political expression. Despite a federal court ruling against the city’s effort to restrict protests to an area far removed from the Democratic National Convention, the police still engaged in tactics designed to intimidate participants, the complaint alleges. Among those activities were surveillance of activists at their headquarters and attempts to close the building. During the convention, the demonstrators were met by “lines of police officers in full riot gear, heavily armed with weapons capable of firing rubber bullets, rubber slugs, bean bags, tear gas and pepper spray,” alleges the complaint, which also names as defendants Police Chief Bernard Parks and five other officers. When a few protesters threw objects at some officers in an isolated area, the police ordered the dispersal of more than 10,000 demonstrators. “Even as demonstrators, legal observers and the media were attempting to leave the area, the police attacked them — trampling people with horses, showering them with chemical weapons, and shooting rubber bullets,” states the complaint, which was signed by ACLU attorney Dan Tokaji. The document cites similar police tactics during a rally in October at police headquarters. The plaintiffs include the Los Angeles chapter of the Oct. 22 Coalition to Stop Police Brutality. The LAPD has denied the allegations contained in the suit, saying the procedures they used were necessary to maintain order.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.