Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
In a decision that could cost New York millions of dollars in revenue, the Division of Tax Appeals has found that the state’s unrelated business income tax is pre-empted by federal law and inapplicable to pension and profit-sharing funds. The first-impression finding by an administrative law judge held that the New York State Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT) is pre-empted by the provisions of the federal Employment and Retirement Security Act (ERISA). It is virtually certain to result in an appeal. Matter of McKinsey Master Retirement Plan Trust, 817551, involves a Manhattan-based international consulting company, McKinsey & Co. At issue are ERISA-governed retirement plans generating debt-financed income, which is subject to UBIT, and one central issue: whether Article 13 of the Tax Law, which carries a 9 percent UBIT, is trumped by ERISA. Administrative Law Judge Dennis M. Galliher found that it is. Although the determination does not carry precedential value, it is likely to be watched closely, since many states, including New York, impose an unrelated business income tax that mirrors the federal UBIT imposed under � 511 of the Internal Revenue Code. The case arose when the trust challenged the unrelated business income tax it was assessed for the years 1994, 1995 and 1996. For each year, the trust was required to calculate a New York State apportionment factor linked to its investment in different funds. Some of those funds earn debt-financed income that is subject to federal UBIT. Under the interpretation of the New York Division of Taxation, that income is also subject to the state UBIT, which resulted in McKinsey Master Retirement Plan Trust paying state unrelated business income tax of $147,412, $4,102 and $225,860 for the years in question. Judge Galliher identified as the critical issue whether the state’s action violates the broadly worded pre-emption provisions of ERISA. The state had argued that New York’s UBIT is not inconsistent with the aim of ERISA, but Galliher found the unrelated business income tax “clearly at odds with Congress’ ERISA intent of providing a uniform body of benefits law which fosters maximum stability and security with minimum conflict of law and regulatory burdens between various jurisdictions.” Additionally, the Division of Taxation maintained that the New York UBIT is only one of a number of considerations that the fund’s investment managers take into account in determining investment choices, and therefore did not unreasonably burden the McKinsey Master Retirement Plan Trust. Again, Judge Galliher disagreed, observing that the state UBIT imposed a liability on every ERISA plan earning unrelated business income, “with the result being a reduction of funds available for plan beneficiaries, coupled with increased administrative burdens on the plans.” “Subjecting ERISA plans to state UBIT, if nothing else, immediately gives rise to reporting and compliance requirements on a state-by-state basis, as well as filing and payment duties which involve estimation and timing issues,” Galliher said. “All of these requirements run counter to the Congressional aim of achieving a uniform body of pension law with minimal financial and administrative burdens and conflicts among and between the different states and between the states and the federal government.” Edward M. Griffith Jr. of Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blain and Huber in Buffalo, N.Y., appeared for the trust. The Division of Taxation was represented by Nicholas A. Behuniak of Albany, N.Y.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.