X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Maybe it was the nipples or the navel. More likely it was the substitution of “Consumer Whore” for “Starbucks Coffee” that got the Seattle-based coffee giant so upset over a Web site parody. Whatever the cause, Starbucks hired some big guns, bringing in John C. Rawls, of the Los Angeles office of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, to file a copyright and trademark infringement suit against a San Francisco cartoonist who does business as Prodigal Turd Productions and Lowest Comic Denominator. Starbucks v. Dwyer, C00 1499. Starbucks has charged that T-shirts, bumper stickers and images on Dwyer’s Web site render the familiar mermaid logo “sexually offensive to a substantial portion of the public” and tarnish the coffee seller’s trademark by associating it “with conduct that many consumers will find lewd, immoral and unacceptable.” Rawls cited a string of cases that dealt with “tarnishment” of famous copyrights, including the “Genital Electric” T-shirts that were found to damage the General Electric trademark; the “Buttwiser” T-shirts, which a court found tarnished the Anheuser-Busch trademark; and the “Gucci Goo” diaper bags, which degraded the marks of the Italian fashion house Gucci. As a result, on April 28, U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney barred Dwyer from posting his parody. The Web site, at www.members.tripod.com/ ~LowestComicD/, features several other consumer-product parodies, including a dope-smoking cartoon character called “Tokemon”; an Evian water look-alike called Elian, with a photo of the Cuban child on the label; and a rejiggering of a Microsoft icon so that the middle, rather than the index, finger is raised. Andrew M. Gold, a partner at San Francisco’s Bogatin, Corman & Gold, represents Dwyer. He argued in court papers that his client’s logo is a parody whose purpose is “to lampoon Starbucks as an icon of rampant consumer-ism.” Gold said that the logo is a parody permitted under the Copyright Act. In asking the court to lift the restraining order, he is painting the dispute as a David-and-Goliath struggle. In the meantime, although the Starbucks parody is no longer on his Web site, Dwyer can’t resist another jab. The following message now pops up on his site: “Please hit cancel or no if you are easily offended, stupid, an employee of or lawyer for, Starbucks Corp. or all of the above. You are not welcome here.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.