Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Similar to a federal law, Massachusetts now has a law that would punish those who defraud the state and provide “whistleblowers” with a cut of any money they help the state recover. Signed by Gov. Paul Cellucci last month, the new law is an amendment to the G.L. Chapter 12, Section 18. Massachusetts is now one of at least seven states that have such a law. The law would allow a whistleblower with direct and independent knowledge of fraud on the state to file an action on behalf of the state and collect anywhere from 15 to 30 percent of the money the commonwealth recovers. The impact of the law is significant since there are numerous industries in Massachusetts that receive state funding, said Boston tort litigator Jeffrey L. Newman, who has handled whistleblower cases on the federal level. The construction and healthcare industries would likely be areas where workers could come forward with allegations of fraud, he said. “The economic incentive to risk your job and reputation is substantial under this law,” said Newman of the firm Newman & Ponsetto. Unlike the federal statute, the state law calls for a much quicker time frame under which the Attorney General’s office must act on a complaint brought by a whistleblower. That provision would provide an incentive for the person alleging the fraud because the Attorney General’s office could not ask for more than two 90-day extensions to present its case. “This is a good thing. This will push cases along precipitously,” Newman said. The state law has much stronger protections against retaliation for the whistleblower than the federal “False Claims Act,” its federal counterpart. Under the state law, no employer can “demote, suspend, threaten, harass, deny promotion or discriminate” in any other way against a person who discloses information about fraud to the government. If there is discrimination, an employee is entitled to be reinstated at the same seniority status and receive two times the amount of back pay, plus interest on the back pay. In addition, the employer would be required to pay the whistleblower’s litigation costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. The whistleblower would also be entitled to emotional distress damages, something that is not allowed under current employment law if an employee is wrongfully terminated, Newman said. In response to the new law, the Attorney General’s office is setting up a special division to handle false claims acts. A spokesman for the Attorney General’s office was unavailable for comment before deadline.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.