Proponents who want to see a tenfold increase in the number of legal opinions published by California's appellate courts will try their luck with a bill in front of the state Assembly Judiciary Committee. The bill would require state courts to make publicly available all opinions deemed to create no new law. It would also allow those opinions to be cited as persuasive authority, though not as precedent.
April 19, 2000 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Like Al Pacino’s coked-up character in Scarface, proposals to revamp California’s opinion publication rules refuse to go down, no matter how many shots they’ve been hit with.
On Tuesday, proponents who want to see a tenfold increase in the number of legal opinions published by California’s appellate courts will try their luck again, this time in front of the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
