If you are representing a client who committed a criminal antitrust violation such as price fixing, bid rigging or horizontal market allocation, at some point you’ll probably come to the Antitrust Division’s Office of Criminal Enforcement (OCE) in Washington, D.C., to ask for amnesty, a favorable charging decision, or help in obtaining a lesser sentence. You can do a lot of good for your client with an effective presentation at this critical meeting–and a lot of harm if you take the wrong approach. We have participated as government lawyers in hundreds of these meetings. Although our Do’s and Don’ts come from the government’s perspective, we believe that successful meetings, with few exceptions, achieve the goals of both the Division and defense counsel.
The OCE supervises all criminal investigations and prosecutions (which are conducted by seven field offices and the Litigation I section in Washington, D.C.) It consists of the deputy assistant attorney general for criminal enforcement (deputy), the director of criminal enforcement (director), and their staff. Both the deputy and the director normally attend the charge-dispositive meetings that are the subject of this article. It is extremely rare for the assistant attorney general in charge of the Antitrust Division to meet with defense counsel in criminal matters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]