Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Just in time for Halloween, a federal judge has resolved a dispute over the legal rights to market a mask inspired by the one worn by the killer in the 1978 horror classic “Halloween,” ruling that the copyright on the mask is invalid because it lacks the “requisite originality.” In his 27-page opinion in Don Post Studios Inc. v. Cinema Secrets Inc., U.S. District Judge Eduardo C. Robreno also ruled that the plaintiff’s “trade dress” claim failed because the mask has not acquired “secondary meaning.” Don Post Studios was the creator of the prototype of the mask worn by the character “Michael Myers” in a series of “Halloween” films. But Robreno found that DPS did not claim or reserve any rights to the mask. In 1986, DPS began marketing a mask called “Don Post the Mask,” that bore a strong resemblance to the one worn in the movie. But in 1999, Cinema Secrets obtained a non-exclusive license from the movie makers to begin producing a “Michael Myers” mask. Robreno found that the ultimate factual issue to be decided by the court was “who copied which mask from whom and, if so, when did the copying take place.” In 1981, DPS requested a license to market the original mask from the first Halloween movie, but the movie makers denied the request. Robreno found that when DPS ultimately applied for a copyright on its later version of the mask, it did so more than five years after the work was created. As a result, Robreno said, the copyright is invalid. Turning to the question of whether Cinema Secrets directly copied the mask, Robreno said he found it “simply not credible” that DPS made no reference to the “Halloween” movie when it created the mask it currently markets. The marketing of the mask showed the connection to the movie, Robreno said, since the model in the ad is holding a knife in “a threatening manner,” similar to the movie character. Because the second version is a copy of the one used in the movie, Robreno said the copyright was invalid. Robreno also concluded that Cinema Secrets “independently created” its licensed version of the mask based only on photographs and a video of the movie.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.