X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Five days after being hit with a $474.5 million verdict in a breach-of-contract lawsuit filed by the state of Mississippi over a tax processing system that never materialized, American Management Systems Inc. (AMS) has settled. On Aug. 23, a Jackson, Miss., jury ordered AMS to pay $299.54 million in compensatories and $175 million in punitives. On Aug. 28, AMS settled, agreeing to pay $185 million over the next 13 years. Fairfax, Va.-based AMS responded to Mississippi’s request for proposals for the system in 1993, said plaintiff’s attorney Armin J. Moeller Jr., of the Jackson office of New Orleans’ Phelps Dunbar L.L.P. AMS, he said, promised to build the system in 36 months and promised it would result in $36.8 million in additional revenues per year. But, said Mr. Moeller, “AMS failed to build the system, and the state never realized any of these gains.” By 1997, AMS had provided only one aspect of the proposed system, a software program called “Withholding I,” he said. “Withholding I was riddled with defects,” he said. “AMS persuaded the state to go on-line, that the defects would be resolved.” But when the state began using it, he said, “it caused the state’s computer system to crash.” This crash caused considerable problems for the state and taxpayers, he said. One restaurant in Biloxi, Miss., was padlocked because of an erroneous tax notice, Mr. Moeller said. In 1999, AMS provided a new version, called Withholding III, but the state declined to accept it, he said, after “AMS said there were defects in this version.” Instead, the state sued AMS for breach of contract. State of Mississippi v. American Management Systems Inc., No. 251-99-382 (Cir. Ct., Hinds Co., Miss.). In addition, the state charged that AMS abandoned development of the Mississippi system because the company had signed lucrative contracts with other states. In a public statement, AMS Chief Executive Officer Paul A. Brands did not admit any liability. He said that the company was settling because “the appeal process would have taken up to two years and been extremely distracting for our management and employees.”

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.