X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
One day after the U.S. Supreme Court told Florida’s highest court to rethink its decision extending the deadline for hand-counted presidential ballots, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta will hear arguments on a related — but much broader — issue. Arguments are scheduled for 9 a.m. today in two separate, but similar, election cases, each challenging the constitutionality of Florida’s hand-counting of ballots. The court will sit en banc and will permit lawyers an hour for each argument — twice the normal time allotted. One appeal, Siegel v. LePore, No. 00-15981 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2000), was filed by the Bush campaign and several Palm Beach County voters. The other, Touchston v. McDermott, No. 00-15985 (11th Cir. Nov. 14, 2000), was brought by Republican voters in Florida’s Brevard County with the help of several conservative public interest law groups. The central difference between the two suits is this: The Brevard County case asks the court to find Florida’s election law permitting hand counts unconstitutional. The Bush suit only questions the constitutionality of the hand count in the current presidential balloting. Both appeals claim that the Florida hand counts deny equal protection under federal voting laws to voters who live outside counties where the manual counts were conducted. They say the process gives additional weight to hand-counted ballots and subjects them to interpretation by possibly partisan election officials and dilutes the votes that were tabulated by machine elsewhere in Florida. The suits complain that Florida law sets no standard for when or how manual counts should be conducted. Bush campaign lawyers in Siegel have argued in their brief that the manual recount process is “unfair, standardless, rife with the potential for abuse and mischief, and highly suspicious.” After the Nov. 7 election, Vice President Al Gore asked for recounts in four populous and predominately Democratic Florida counties. In a Nov. 17 order, the Court of Appeals denied emergency motions filed by the Bush campaign and the Brevard voters for an injunction to halt the hand-counting and invalidate any vote totals that included hand-counted ballots. But the court denied that motion, although it did so without prejudice, leaving both appellants free to ask for an injunction again. The en banc order said that while states have the primary authority to resolve most election controversies, federal courts “may act to preserve and decide claims of violations of the Constitution of the United States in certain circumstances, especially where a state remedy is inadequate.” As attorneys prepared for today’s oral arguments, the Court of Appeals granted the state of Florida’s motion to intervene in an order issued Friday. And, in a supplemental brief filed Monday, lawyers for Florida’s Democratic Party (FDP), an intervenor in the appeals, argued that the parties in the Brevard case, Touchston, should be realigned. Specifically, they want Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, who is listed as a defendant/appellee in the suit because of her official position, to be made a plaintiff/appellant. Harris, they claim, has consistently taken legal stances that show her interests are more aligned with the plaintiffs — Republican voters — than with the other defendants. Harris, active in Bush’s Florida campaign, has “maintained positions hostile to the interests of FDP throughout the course of each and every lawsuit relating to the outcome of the election,” the brief says.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.