Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A three-judge Federal Circuit panel last month ruled that a federal employee could be fired for an off-duty adulterous relationship. The result didn’t come easily. One judge dissented strongly, and even the majority explained that, under different facts, such private off-duty conduct would not justify removal. The case involves Michael Brown, a morale program manager at the U.S. Marine base at Camp Lejeune, N.C., and his relationship with the wife of a Marine major. Brown managed Camp Lejeune’s morale, welfare, and recreation department, a civilian job even though Brown himself was an officer in the Marine reserves. His duties included coordinating picnics, dinners, and other social events for Marines and their families. In 1997, Marine authorities fired Brown after they learned he had conducted an adulterous affair with the wife of a Marine major deployed overseas. Brown did not meet the major’s wife as a result of the morale program, according to the court record. They had known each other since 1992, when Brown and the major were stationed together in Quantico, Va. But an administrative judge upheld the firing, finding that Brown’s conduct was antithetical to his program’s mission and eroded the Marines’ trust in his job performance. By a 3-1 vote, the Merit Systems Protection Board affirmed the judge’s ruling last year. On appeal, Federal Circuit Judges William Bryson and Alvin Schall voted to uphold the lower holdings against Brown, but they had reservations about doing so. “To be sure,” Bryson wrote for both judges, “this case is a difficult one because the misconduct was private in nature and did not affect Mr. Brown’s official responsibilities in any direct and obvious way. “In many settings, such conduct would not be sufficient to justify removal from a civil service position.” But Bryson agreed with the administrative judge that the Marines’ “necessary trust and confidence was undermined” by the affair, thereby establishing a nexus between Brown’s conduct and his job performance. Judge Richard Linn dissented, arguing that the Marines failed to prove a connection between Brown’s personal indiscretion and his actual job performance. While not condoning adultery, Linn concluded, “the majority opinion risks being viewed as sanctioning the removal of an employee simply because of a difference in values between that employee and his superiors.” The opinion, Linn added, “grants virtually unbridled discretion to management.” Kevin Grile of the American Federation of Government Employees represented Brown. Grile said he and his client have not decided whether to appeal the ruling further. Marian Sullivan of the Department of Justice represented the government.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.