But that is the only duty such an agency owes to its temporary workers, Lycoming County Common Pleas Court Judge Clinton Smith said in Kappas v. Andritz Inc., PICS Case No. 00-0507 (C.P. Lycoming March 17, 2000) Smith, J. (21 pages). He warned that a higher degree of responsibility would put an unfair financial burden on temp agencies and give opportunistic claimants just one more excuse to seek workers’ compensation benefits.

Smith’s decision set a standard for other common pleas court judges to use when deciding summary judgment motions in similar cases.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]