In his March 27 Open Court article, ” Debunking the Myths of Merit Selection,” George M. Kraw asserts that support for merit selection or for qualifying commissions as judicial selection techniques is naive.
While no system is perfect, merit selection of judges is head and shoulders above an elective system, with its need for campaign coffers, or any other system where individual judges may appear or actually feel accountable to those putting them on the bench.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
