Custody disputes should be settled in favor of the natural parent unless a third party is a “psychological parent,” a biological parent is unfit or exceptional circumstances exist, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in a split decision.

“A review of the statutory and common law of custody disputes convinces us that in an action between a parent and a third party, a presumption of custody exists in favor of the parent,” Justice James Coleman Jr. wrote for the 5-2 majority in Watkins v. Nelson, A-11-99. “New Jersey’s comprehensive custody-statutory scheme proclaims that ‘it is in the public policy of this State to assure minor children of frequent and continuing contact with both parents.’”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]