X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Scott Kerman — who wrote “No Ticket? No Problem!” — tried to publicize his book by crashing the Academy Award ceremonies in 1997 and has seen his problems multiply ever since. First, Kerman was arrested and forced to spend nine hours in a South Central Los Angeles jail with assorted felons eying his tuxedo, he said in court documents. Then, he and his attorneys sued for false arrest, and he was forced to tell the court that the part of his book that said he had sneaked into 300 concerts and sporting events was “pure fiction.” A number of summary judgments later, one judge tossed out his suit, and another slapped him with a restraining order to keep him away from future Oscar ceremonies. Which brings us to July 31, when the Los Angeles business litigation firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges sued Kerman for malicious prosecution. The latest problem for Kerman was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, with Oscar counsel David Quinto and his firm, Quinn Emanuel, as the lead plaintiffs. Joining in the action is the 71-year-old Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, whose executive director, Bruce Davis, has been quoted in the press as saying his group would certainly like to have the $100,000 in legal fees it spent fighting Kerman to use to restore aging film instead. Quinn Emanuel attorney Christopher Tayback, who filed the suit, won’t say whether that’s the amount in dispute. He also had no comment on a 1998 Los Angeles Times report that Kerman, formerly of Marina del Rey, had moved out of state. “I’m not going into anything beyond what is in the complaint,” he said. The suit says Kerman groundlessly alleged 10 torts against the Academy and Quinn Emanuel, and named Quinto in nine of them. They ranged from assault and battery to false light invasion of privacy. “From the outset, the record was clear that the defendant’s factual allegations lacked any evidentiary support,” the suit alleges. And “Quinto was thrice forced to file motions for summary adjudication,” only to have Kerman’s lawyers repeatedly continue hearings. At Kerman’s law firm, LaTorraca & Goettsch, a receptionist said all questions about the suit were being referred to co-defendant Raymond Goettsch, and he is out of the office for several days.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.