Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. has been left to defend itself in 19 cases alleging that it engaged in negligent supervision of independent agents selling its insurance, following a ruling by a Manhattan Supreme Court justice.

Justice Charles Edward Ramos concluded in Westchester Fire Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Index No. 602970/98, that companies which issued general business risk insurance policies to Met Life were excused from defense obligations under policy exclusions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]