The Supreme Court justices, six of whom are grandparents, seemed tempted on Wednesday to rule against grandparents’ interests in the thorny case of Troxel v. Granville, a test of a broad Washington state law that allows any third party to petition for visitation rights in the “best interests” of the child.

Several justices seemed concerned that such a wide-open law would allow anyone to “walk in off the street,” as Justice David Souter put it, and seek visitation even if the child’s parents disapprove. Hypotheticals abounded — an aunt, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor suggested, an accordion player, posited Justice Stephen Breyer — all of whom could intrude on core family privacy, as the justices worried in hourlong oral arguments Wednesday.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]