The Court of Chancery confirmed that a majority shareholder’s amendments to expand the board of directors in order to regain corporate control were valid, despite a provision in the company’s bylaws requiring a supermajority vote.

The majority shareholder succeeded by shrewdly finding a loophole in order to accomplish what only a supermajority vote, without his strategic maneuvering, could have done. Chancellor William B. Chandler III found the moves were legitimate when he issued a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Sam J. Frankino v. John A. Gleason, National Auto Credit Inc., et al.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]