In contrast to all the “glamorous” cases on the U.S. Supreme Court’s plate this term — and there are many hot-button constitutional questions — a “homely” challenge, in the words of one litigator, could transform the landscape of job bias litigation in this country.

The homeliness of Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc., No. 99-536, is certainly not in its facts: A 57-year-old factory supervisor, fired after 40 years of service, sues his employer for age discrimination. But it can be seen in the plain, everyday, yet fundamental, questions of proof that the justices now face.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]