Every year or so, journalists find themselves on the wrong end of a court ruling, usually in cases alleging libel, invasion of privacy, or similar torts. After a news organization suffers its defeat, dire predictions appear in the very newspapers and magazines and on the very broadcast stations owned by the defeated parties.

The complaints are predictable: This court decision will be the end of news gathering as we have known it. The court has misread the law, has trampled on the special First Amendment rights of reporters and editors. As a result, readers and viewers will be less well-informed. Don’t blame us, though. Blame the misguided judges, petty plaintiffs, and greedy plaintiffs’ lawyers for this travesty.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]