A $2.375 million fine imposed by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission against the seller of software designed to make trading recommendations was “capricious and indefensible” given the lack of demonstrated harm to purchasers of the software, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Feb. 24, remanding the case for a new penalty assessment that takes into account mitigating evidence of customer satisfaction (R & W Technical Services Ltd. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 5th Cir., No. 99-60182, 2/24/00).

R & W Technical Services sold software that analyzed financial data and made buy and sell recommendations. Advertisements for the software included claims of enormous profits and characterized results as “certified.” However, R & W never tested the system by making trades in actual markets; rather, all performance data came from hypothetical “paper trades” that the company tracked.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]