Yoko Ono Lennon cannot maintain a copyright infringement action for unidentified photographs she claims are in the defendant’s possession since she neither owns a registered copyright in the photographs nor has applied for one, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York held Feb. 15 (Lennon v. Seaman, S.D.N.Y., No. 99 Civ. 2664 (LBS), 2/15/00).

Lennon brought this suit alleging that the defendant infringed her copyrights in photographs of the Lennon family displayed by the defendant on a television program and published in the defendant’s book. At this point in the litigation, the court considered the defendant’s motion to dismiss counts based on unidentified photographs allegedly in the defendant’s possession and fraud on the Copyright Office.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]