If a pension plan includes an ambiguous term, the plan administrator has a fiduciary duty under ERISA to inform beneficiaries of the company’s interpretation, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.
The ruling in Harte v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. announces a four-part test for analyzing a claim of breach of fiduciary duty under Section 502(a)(3) of ERISA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]