Just when you thought the difficulty of establishing standing rendered citizens’ environmental lawsuits against corporations obsolete, the U.S. Supreme Court Jan. 12 handed down Friends of the Earth Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc. (2 CLW 67, 1/20/00). In the decision, penned by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, the Court decided that Friends of the Earth Inc. initially had standing to bring the lawsuit, based on the sworn testimony of several individuals who claimed they could no longer enjoy South Carolina’s North Tyger River due to their perception that the river was polluted. In addition, the Court found that FOE’s claim was not rendered moot when, after the filing of the lawsuit, Laidlaw came into compliance with its chemical discharge permit and closed the hazardous waste incinerator facility in question.
BACK TO THE ’70S
The Laidlaw decision resolved several issues relating to the law of standing, primarily as it relates to citizen’s environmental suits. Citizens’ lawsuits are filed under statutes, like the Clean Water Act, that allow private citizens to bring environmental actions if the government has not taken appropriate action. The CWA also provides for damages paid as a fine to the U.S. Treasury, and the award of attorney’s fees to the citizens’ group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]