The D.C. Board on Professional Responsibility, the arm of the D.C. Court of Appeals that handles lawyer discipline, has recommended that cocaine addiction not be treated as a mitigating factor in ethics cases.

The BPR’s recommendation came in a sharply worded 13-page brief in a case involving a lawyer who used the proceeds of a personal injury settlement check to buy cocaine, then concealed his actions from the client and bar counsel. If found liable, the lawyer could be disbarred. But he is arguing that the court should impose a lesser punishment because he stole the client’s money as a direct result of cocaine addiction.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]