Towns opposed to cellular towers within their borders may dictate how and where the structures are built but must also show that those decisions won’t cause major gaps in wireless phone service, a federal appeals panel has ruled.

The Third Circuit’s Nov. 19 ruling affirmed a summary judgment that the Ho-Ho-Kus Board of Adjustment did not violate federal law in denying 13 variances to AT&T Wireless Services, Bell Atlantic Nynex Mobile and Nextel Communications for a cell tower.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]