Washington — A majority of U.S. Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Monday of allowing private “whistle-blowers” to prosecute potentially lucrative suits against state governments in federal court under a Civil War-era anti-fraud law.

The court’s states’ rights-minded conservatives voiced doubts about the legality of such suits, known in legal jargon as qui tam actions. In addition, Justice Stephen Breyer, who typically votes with the liberal bloc on federalism issues, also appeared adamantly opposed to permitting private parties to use the federal False Claims Act to trigger claims against state governments.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]