After issuing an order of protection to a woman forced to flee her home because of abuse by her husband and son, a Family Court judge erred when she let the two men stay in the home once the victim had found a new residence, a state appeals panel has ruled.

In a sharply-worded opinion, a four-judge panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, said that the lower court had held the woman “hostage” to the “potential homelessness of her abuser” by refusing to consider her request to move back into the home.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]