On Dec. 1, the Supreme Court will set its collective foot once again in what a lower court has accurately called the “vast, perplexing desert of Establishment Clause jurisprudence.” And if history is any guide, the Court will only make the desert a little more vast and perplexing.

The Court will hear argument in Mitchell v. Helms, No. 98-1648, a case challenging the constitutionality of government aid to religious schools. Nowhere is the Court’s establishment clause doctrine more perplexing than with respect to aid to religious schools. And nowhere is the Court’s doctrine more under attack, as several states and local governments have enacted voucher programs providing direct subsidies to children who choose to attend religious schools. Mitchell v. Helms does not present the constitutionality of vouchers per se, but as it is argued and decided, everyone’s eyes will be focused on the voucher cases coming down the road.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]